The boot though measures 300 litres making it the best in class offering which can be extended to 1115 litres by folding the rear seat down. But having said that it does lend a bit of character to the country’s favourite small family hatch. Also, if you have an Android phone, the system will most likely drop your Bluetooth connection within seconds.2kmpl compared to 24. Boot space too is lesser compared to the KwidWhere the Kwid comes with a 7-inch touchscreen entertainment system with Bluetooth connectivity, the Alto makes do with a single DIN audio system with USB and AUX only. The driver’s perch is comfortable for even the taller and generously proportioned occupants.On the move, the engine on the Kwid also feels jerky whereas the engine on the Alto feels refined and composed. It looks rather well made and appealing to the eye especially the piano black finish on the centre console around the infotainment system.34 lakh ex showroom Delhi compared to the Rs 3. But the low refinement levels and the jerky nature of the engine work against it. In addition, the Alto is also cheaper with the VXi (O) variant that we have here being priced at Rs 3. Interior, Space and FeaturesWhen it comes to the interior, the Kwid makes great use of the space inside the car despite its size.

For someone upgrading from two-wheels to four, or for someone eyeing their first car, these two cars come across as go-to options. Half the windshield is taken up by the bonnet and the rear windscreen looks like it’s half a kilometre away from the rearview mirror. The instrument cluster is an all digital affair which looks rather good and gives a slight motorcycle-esque feel though it is devoid of a tachometer. Ride and HandlingThe ride on the Kwid is nothing short of great considering its price and size. But, with the Kwid, the segment has turned into a two-horse race. Engine and Performance Both cars come with engines with similar capacities and three cylinder layouts. There are silver accents on the steering wheel and on the centre console along with fabric door inserts on all four doors. The entire cabin is bathed in different shades of black and is made of plastic. But they are miles apart in terms of character and performance. In the handling department, the Alto comes off much better than the Kwid because of the way it’s suspension is set up. But the engine on the Kwid feels crude compared to the one on the Maruti which feels smooth and refined.Medi_. Also, the driving experience isn’t as great as you would expect. The brakes too are progressive, provide plenty of feel and stopping power. The chrome inserts on the AC China rubber wheels Factory vents give the cabin a more upmarket feel. The seats are comfortable with adequate thigh support, the back support too is good but the side support is rather limited, though leg space is decent. And the Kwid quite noisier too.

 The steering is quite direct and shifting through the gears as you approach a bend is nothing short of a treat.jpeg The Alto was the go-to choice for the first-time car buyer, and in some rare cases, the Eon or the Nano found a space in the garage. The Alto was the go-to choice for the first-time car buyer, and in some rare cases, the Eon or the Nano found a space in the garage. The power window (front only) buttons sit in a familiar place, just ahead of the handbrake like before compared to Kwid’s which sit on the centre console just below the AC controls. Then there is the brand value that Maruti Suzuki enjoys which also contributes to a better resale value and the fact that Maruti has one of the most extensive dealer networks in the country also helps the Alto’s case by a great degree. The prominent front grille flanked by two sleek looking headlamps, a large front bumper with plastic cladding and a contoured bonnet give this hatch an SUV like appeal.In terms of fuel efficiency, the Kwid is more fuel efficient than the Maruti but only just 25. In addition, the view both front and rear from the driver’s seat is rather good and the car gives a roomy feel despite being rather small.71 Lakh asking price of the

But the fuel tank capacity of the Alto stands at 35 litres compared to 28 litres for the Kwid which means the Alto will go farther on a single tank of fuel compared to its French counterpart.The Alto’s cabin on the other hand is the familiar cabin that we are quite used to. The suspension has been well set up for the city and the car swallows up almost all undulations with minimal fuss. Add to that the slightly raised stance and black plastic cladding all around the car along with a high tailgate and you have a car that could almost be passed on as an entry level crossover. dc-Cover-3a4cimrlqf8vpmci921188o664-20160628191422. The instrument cluster of the Kwid also comes with a gear shift indicator, a feature that is missing on the Maruti.The new updated Alto, on the other hand, stays mostly true its design since 2012 barring minor aesthetic changes to the front facia and the rear bumper. The space in the rear too is ample and you seldom feel uncomfortable despite the lack in kneeroom. It’s no tarmac scorcher but a fun drive nonetheless. Space in the rear though is adequate only for two and taller occupants will feel the lack of headroom. Before the little Renault came to our shores, an Alto 800, Nano or the Eon graced a first-time car buyer's garage.7kmpl. But, if we compare apples to apples and consider just the two cars as standalone products, the Kwid is by far the superior product and the winner in this comparison as it offers the single most important thing that a buyer from this segment looks for: Value For Money!Source: CarDekho. The narrow grille has been replaced by a thin slat (like on the Chevy Spark). Design There’s no contesting the fact that despite aesthetics being a subjective matter, the Renault is the not only the better looking of the two here but is easily the best looking car in its segment. Where the Kwid sports a softer setup, the Alto’s stiffer springs help keep the body roll in check. It probably has the best driving dynamics in its segment and it shows. Sitting on the driver’s seat I have to admit, the visibility is limited. However, the plastic quality the steering wheel feels a bit coarser than it should. The 800cc unit on the Kwid makes 54PS of peak power and 72Nm of peak torque whereas the Alto makes 50PS of peak power and 69Nm of peak torque. The Alto on the other hand despite being less powerful is easier and yet much more engaging to drive and also offers great fuel economy along with a peace of mind ownership experience. The Kwid’s infotainment system though features a great touch interface, figuring out the system itself takes time. The usual smile of the Alto’s fascia has now been replaced by a grimace, maybe to make the car look a bit more aggressive. The brakes on the Kwid offer less bite overall and are not what you would call confidence inspiring (at high speeds) but do the job well in city traffic. Also there is no satellite navigation like on the Renault.The Renault Kwid has shaken up the entry-level car scene in the country. But the extra power and torque placed primarily at the top of the rev range translate to a quick accelerating car